The Water Crisis in Facts and Figures

image

28 August 2013 | Dominic Waughray

Currently, about 70% of the world’s freshwater withdrawals are for agriculture, 16% are for energy and industry and 14% are for domestic purposes. Recent work suggests that unless we change the way we use water, we could face a 40% gap by 2030 between global demand and what can sustainably be supplied.

Many countries are extracting groundwater faster than it can be replenished (Mexico by 20%, China by 25% and India by 56%). More than 70 of the world’s major rivers now hardly reach the ocean because of the extensive diversion of water for human use. If current trends continue, by 2030 increasing water scarcity could cause annual grain losses equivalent to 30% of current world consumption (at the same time as the UN Food and Agriculture Organization says we will actually need 70% more food).

It is not only a question of more people requiring more water. In the 20th century, while population grew by a factor of four, freshwater withdrawals grew by a factor of nine. As we grow wealthier, the more freshwater we need to supply cities, power plants and factories and to produce higher protein food such as dairy, meat and fish.

Water for Food

A kilogram of meat requires up to 20,000 litres of water to produce (compared with about 1,200 litres to produce a kilo of grain). Global demand for meat is forecast to increase 50% by 2025.

Water for Energy

The United States Geological Survey estimates that to produce and burn the 1 billion tonnes of coal the country uses each year, the mining and utility industries withdraw 55 to 75 trillion imperial gallons of water annually. That’s about the equivalent to all the water that pours over Niagara Falls in five months. The International Energy Agency forecasts that the world economy will demand at least 40% more energy by 2030 ; for non-OECD countries where the increase in energy demand will be highest, coal remains an important energy option.

A Nexus of Water Challenges

This water-for-food vs water-for-energy dilemma the United States faces is similar to the “nexus” challenge which many fast-growing economies will have to tackle soon: how to simultaneously manage water for food, energy, people and the environment?

For example, as much of Asia becomes more urbanized and industrialized,more water will be directed towards energy and away from agriculture. Modelling undertaken for the World Economic Forum suggests that a 76% increase in water demand for energy and industry will be required across Asia by 2030 compared with today. This will occur at exactly the same time as these countries will need to almost double their food production. Against a baseline of 70% of water already being used for agriculture, how can these competing challenges be squared?

In addition, changing climatic conditions will accelerate freshwater security challenges. Unlike options in energy, there are no substitutes or alternatives to water. We will simply have to adapt. This is not only a problem for the poorest nations. Water security will affect people in Australia, the Balkans, California, China, India, Jordan, Greece, Mexico, North Africa, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Spain, South Africa and Turkey among others. In fact dryland areas represent more than 40% of the world’s surface area, covering over 100 countries.

For all these reasons, business as usual is not an option. We cannot manage water into the future as we have in the past. The good news is that a transformation in management of the world’s water is beginning. Unlike climate change, no one argues that the water security problem does not exist, or that solutions are not urgently required. New technologies, new arrangements and new policies will be needed. The water services sector, water processing, water-recycling technologies and water policy links to the energy and agricultural sectors are fast becoming a busy space for business, financial and professional services firms, policy-makers and issue specialists.

A reservoir is seen in Mallorca REUTERS/Enrique Calvo

 

The blog was originally posted on World Economic Forum. To read the original blog, click here.